The text covers:
iPhone is undoubtedly more than a device – it is a cultural and social phenomenon initially powering the smartphone revolution ignited by device’s first release in June 2007. Since then, the device’s popularity skyrocketed, as the brand saw an impressive share of 13,2% in global smartphone unit sales. It is especially impressive when seen in the context – Apple is a premium brand, while these figures include also a no-name or budget brands, sold on emerging markets.
iOS-powered devices see the biggest popularity in strong economies of the US, Canada, Scandinavia, and Australia. At the end of 2017 78% of US teens owned an iPhone and 80% claimed that their next smartphone will be also iOS-powered.
Considering that, it is no surprise, that Apple is strong enough to force own frameworks and programming languages – and that’s basically what Swift is.
Swift is a modern, general-purpose and multi-paradigm programming language designed by Apple to build their iOS-powered devices and all the following ecosystem. Apps can be designed to run also on macOS (for Apple computers), watchOS (AppleWatch), tvOS (Apple TV digital media player) and, what may be a bit surprising z/OS, that is powering IBM Mainframe computers.
The language is currently distributed on Apache License, that makes it available for the community to use. It’s a relatively new project, launched in June 2014, seven years after first iPhone’s launch.
React native is widely used and established technology, leveraged by Facebook and Walmart apps among others.
Mobile apps are becoming not only a mere tool to solve a problem. It is getting more about lifestyle and establishing the bond with user – if they have an app installed, the brand is constantly in their pocket or under their hand. According to IDC data, 80% of smartphone owners check their device no later than 15 minutes after getting up – effectively before even brushing teeth. Considering that, having an app is a must.
Nevertheless, building the app is a cost – sometimes a huge one, when it comes to cutting-edge cross platform mobile development. Cutting costs without losing quality may be a huge gain for companies. Moreover, when developing apps, companies need to address the needs of both iPhone and Android-powered devices, effectively preparing two separate software pieces designed to perform the same task – the most sturdy form of cross-platform mobile app development.
But optimization may come with costs that are not to accept easily. Considering that, comparing the possibilities of React Native vs. Swift is accurate.
Developing an outstanding app is a sum of many factors, yet there are few indicators that have the greatest value. Let the React Native vs. Swift comparison begin!
But first, here is a TL;DR version 😉
Swift, being the iOS-native language designed by Apple to power apps has obviously no issues with integrating into the iOS design and leveraging all the UX principles. On the other hand, building the app with Swift is, in fact, coding a native app from scratch. Thus, every element needs to be polished separately.
Swift is, well… Swift when it comes to coding, as the language took off the legacy of Objective-C used before, making the process easier and getting rid of drawbacks. It is a convenient way to build an iOS app.
The game changes when it comes to building the Android app. With React Native it may be even copy-paste process (to some extent). If the app was built with Swift, the process starts from the beginning.
Intuition suggests that the native app should be better performing than the framework-based one. But it is not that simple.
Various tests seen among web show, that when comparing two identical apps performing the same actions, the differences vary from the task. React Native is slightly better when coming to CPU usage optimization, but dealing with graphical effects may be more troublesome for the framework. To tackle the challenge, React Native enables developers to embed the native code into the app, delivering the code chimera using different tools and assets to deal with different tasks.
But the sole fact of differences being not significant is a great testimony for React Native.
React Native, despite being powered by one of the most renowned programming language, is not producing really native app. Its work is based on leveraging the internal APIs and libraries to make the app work. Thus, it is about adding a middle-man between the code and the platform.
On the other hand, Swift produces a native app, that may leverage all the platform’s possibilities. As mentioned above, Swift performs better when dealing with graphic effects and computational-heavy tasks. So when it comes to juicing-out the platform, Swift may be the better choice.
But is every app juicing-out the iPhone? And how many Swift developers are skilled enough to build the app that is optimized enough to perform in a more stable way than React Native one?
Both React Native and Swift are supported and maintained by tech giants. React Native is a Facebook-backed project, and Swift cames from Apple. Considering that, both projects are well-documented and organized.
Both projects are relatively new, with Swift been launched in 2014 and React Native in 2015 (being a direct descendant of React.js which has been in use inside Facebook since 2011 and gone open source in 2013). These technologies are emerging, yet there are few significant differences.
Swift is a new programming language designed to be the next step after Objective-C. Designing a programming language is always a thorny process, as it is a backbone of every piece of software.
Programming and IT-business are based on a bit schizophrenic paradigm of building new stuff with old tools. Despite tech-giants’ efforts and emerging programming languages seen as prodigies, aged, sometimes even antiquated stuff doesn’t leave the field. At least not easily
Fortran may be an example of extreme example of programming language resilience. Launched in 1957, four years before Yuri Gagarin’s space flight and nine years before landing on the moon.
Oh, and 28 years prior to the first edition of the Windows operating system. And yet, Fortran is still in use, especially in heavy-computing fields like weather prediction and astronomy.
Preparing the app with Swift may come with some performance boosts and enables the developer to leverage all the possibilities provided by iOS. But in most cases, the gain appears to be not-that-significant when comparing the React Native vs. Swift possibilities.
Not to mention the fact, that there is a whole world of Android users waiting for the app. Is building a new one from scratch really that good idea, especially with some React Native development company ready to provide support?
We highly recommend to check out our other articles. If you are looking for a career opportunity, feel free to browse our job offers. Do you want to have your digital project estimated? Just click on a button below.Estimate project Browse job offers
We are software developement house located in the hearth of Europe - Warsaw, Poland. Our main areas of expertise include Ruby on Rails, React and React Native.