The text covers:
iPhone is undoubtedly more than a device – it is a cultural and social phenomenon initially powering the smartphone revolution ignited by device’s first release in June 2007. Since then, the device’s popularity skyrocketed, as the brand saw an impressive share of 13,2% in global smartphone unit sales. It is especially impressive when seen in the context – Apple is a premium brand, while these figures include also a no-name or budget brands, sold on emerging markets.
iOS-powered devices see the biggest popularity in strong economies of the US, Canada, Scandinavia, and Australia. At the end of 2017 78% of US teens owned an iPhone and 80% claimed that their next smartphone will be also iOS-powered.
Considering that, it is no surprise, that Apple is strong enough to force own frameworks and programming languages – and that’s basically what Swift is.
Swift is a modern, general-purpose and multi-paradigm programming language designed by Apple to build their iOS-powered devices and all the following ecosystem. Apps can be designed to run also on macOS (for Apple computers), watchOS (AppleWatch), tvOS (Apple TV digital media player) and, what may be a bit surprising z/OS, that is powering IBM Mainframe computers.
The language is currently distributed on Apache License, that makes it available for the community to use. It’s a relatively new project, launched in June 2014, seven years after first iPhone’s launch.
Mobile apps are becoming not only a mere tool to solve a problem. It is getting more about lifestyle and establishing the bond with user – if they have an app installed, the brand is constantly in their pocket or under their hand. According to IDC data, 80% of smartphone owners check their device no later than 15 minutes after getting up – effectively before even brushing teeth. Considering that, having an app is a must.
Nevertheless, building the app is a cost – sometimes a huge one, when it comes to cutting-edge cross platform mobile development. Cutting costs without losing quality may be a huge gain for companies. Moreover, when developing apps, companies need to address the needs of both iPhone and Android-powered devices, effectively preparing two separate software pieces designed to perform the same task – the most sturdy form of cross-platform mobile app development.
But optimization may come with costs that are not to accept easily. Considering that, comparing the possibilities of React Native vs. Swift is accurate.
Developing an outstanding app is a sum of many factors, yet there are few indicators that have the greatest value. Let the React Native vs. Swift comparison begin!
But first, here is a TL;DR version 😉
Swift, being the iOS-native language designed by Apple to power apps has obviously no issues with integrating into the iOS design and leveraging all the UX principles. On the other hand, building the app with Swift is, in fact, coding a native app from scratch. Thus, every element needs to be polished separately.
Swift is, well… Swift when it comes to coding, as the language took off the legacy of Objective-C used before, making the process easier and getting rid of drawbacks. It is a convenient way to build an iOS app.
The game changes when it comes to building the Android app. With React Native it may be even copy-paste process (to some extent). If the app was built with Swift, the process starts from the beginning.
Intuition suggests that the native app should be better performing than the framework-based one. But it is not that simple.
Various tests seen among web show, that when comparing two identical apps performing the same actions, the differences vary from the task. React Native is slightly better when coming to CPU usage optimization, but dealing with graphical effects may be more troublesome for the framework. To tackle the challenge, React Native enables developers to embed the native code into the app, delivering the code chimera using different tools and assets to deal with different tasks.
But the sole fact of differences being not significant is a great testimony for React Native.
As a strict opposition - the problems related to Swift are referring to only one type of programming - the iOS app development. Considering that, the problems’ classes are narrow and assuming one is not looking for a solution for some extremely sophisticated challenge never encountered before, spotting the solution or asking about it in the community can be significantly easier.
Thus, a larger community can sometimes give more confusion than a real benefit.
React Native, despite being powered by one of the most renowned programming language, is not producing really native app. Its work is based on leveraging the internal APIs and libraries to make the app work. Thus, it is about adding a middle-man between the code and the platform.
On the other hand, Swift produces a native app, that may leverage all the platform’s possibilities. As mentioned above, Swift performs better when dealing with graphic effects and computational-heavy tasks. So when it comes to juicing-out the platform, Swift may be the better choice.
But is every app juicing-out the iPhone? And how many Swift developers are skilled enough to build the app that is optimized enough to perform in a more stable way than React Native one?
Both React Native and Swift are supported and maintained by tech giants. React Native is a Facebook-backed project, and Swift comes from Apple. Considering that, both projects are well-documented and organized. In fact, both technologies deliver standards of commenting the code in a way that can be easily converted into the documentation, significantly reducing the required time. To be precise:
But apart from the documentation delivered by the project-owner, there is another aspect of delivering the IT project - the ease and automation of documenting the delivered code. There is a (not really) humorous statement regarding the need to write comments and deliver reliable documentation of any code written:
Any code of your own that you haven't looked at for six or more months might as well have been written by someone else.
So in fact - no matter how brilliant a programmer is, any underdocumented code is spaghetti at a first glance. Automated documentation features - both enabling adding the comments and exporting the complete documents, can be a huge time saver.
When it comes to this aspect, React Native has significantly more sophisticated tools to automate delivering the documentation or even supporting the discussion among coders during the development process.
So considering this point of view - the advantage is on React Native’s side.
Both projects are relatively new, with Swift been launched in 2014 and React Native in 2015 (being a direct descendant of React.js which has been in use inside Facebook since 2011 and gone open source in 2013). These technologies are emerging, yet there are few significant differences.
Swift is a new programming language designed to be the next step after Objective-C. Designing a programming language is always a thorny process, as it is a backbone of every piece of software.
Last but not least, the development cost is one of the key aspects to take into... well… account, when thinking about picking a particular technology to deliver the project. Most of the challenges in this field can be solved with a simple graph depicting the increasing quality with the increasing price. But that’s not necessarily the truth - especially considering the iOS app development.
According to various estimations, there is no significant difference in the coders’ hourly wages with slightly higher earnings of the swift development teams:
From $80 to $300 in the U.S.
From $70 to $350 in the U.S.
From $50 to $200 in Western Europe
From $60 to $250 in Western Europe
From $25 and $150 in Eastern Europe
From $30 to $120 in Eastern Europe
Apparently, the difference is not that big when it comes to a single coder, yet they stack when dealing with a large project or numerous coders within the team.
So when thinking about the development cost counted in hard currency, React Native is slightly cheaper while keeping all the benefits it delivers.
The numbers above can be confusing - why for Linus Torvald’s sake the coder who delivers the app only for one mobile OS is paid better than the guy or girl whose code can be used on both leading platforms at the same time, effectively cutting the development time and costs by half.
Ok, so we have all the techie-magic behind us and the crucial question comes in - what is the real difference between these two languages and can one spot a significant difference? The best test can be performed on two similar-yet-totally different apps like Facebook app on iOS and LinkedIn app for iOS.
Both are data-heavy social media apps with the feed to display, messages to exchange and ads to show. Also, both deliver a significant amount of content and need to be optimized to perform well and harness the user’s data - in the end, the mobile app is one of the best ways to obtain the data the company finds hard to collect in other ways, like localization or behavioral patterns.
The key differences are seen in two crucial fields - performance and features. The LinkedIn app in Swift seems bloated when compared to Facebook’s despite the relatively lesser amount of data to process and analyze. Also, the LinkedIn app seems to be less intuitive, yet it is the matter of UX and design, not the programming technology used to deliver the product.
Programming and IT-business are based on a bit schizophrenic paradigm of building new stuff with old tools. Despite tech-giants’ efforts and emerging programming languages seen as prodigies, aged, sometimes even antiquated stuff doesn’t leave the field. At least not easily
Fortran may be an example of extreme example of programming language resilience. Launched in 1957, four years before Yuri Gagarin’s space flight and nine years before landing on the moon.
Oh, and 28 years prior to the first edition of the Windows operating system. And yet, Fortran is still in use, especially in heavy-computing fields like weather prediction and astronomy.
Preparing the app with Swift may come with some performance boosts and enables the developer to leverage all the possibilities provided by iOS. But in most cases, the gain appears to be not-that-significant when comparing the React Native vs. Swift possibilities.
Not to mention the fact, that there is a whole world of Android users waiting for an app.
But hey, you are not reading this blog post by accident - for some reason, you were looking for the comparison between the react native and swift. Even if our comparison shows that React Native is a better pick, we have no information about the challenge waiting for your business you want to solve with an app. And the background can be a game-changer - sometimes there are details that make picking one technology over another a must, even if they are similar at first glance or another one seems to be better.
Technology is not about getting obsessed about a particular technology - it is about cherry-picking the best bits and making the solution that outperforms the rest of the market. That’s why we keep our team of multi-talented and skilled experts ready to think out-of-the-box. So if you are looking if React Native or Swift fits your project better - maybe just drop us a line, so we could find out together?
In the end, the best pick can be Fortran, right?
We highly recommend to check out our other articles. If you are looking for a career opportunity, feel free to browse our job offers. Do you want to have your digital project estimated? Just click on a button below.Estimate project Browse job offers
We are software developement house located in the hearth of Europe - Warsaw, Poland. Our main areas of expertise include Ruby on Rails, React and React Native.